The cost of corruption is more than 5 per cent of global GDP, or $US2.6 trillion, and corporates are now fighting corruption with tools like ISO Certification. The statistics come from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), as per a report on unimedliving.com
Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Laws around the world
Governments around the world are responding for a need to enact new legislation to fight corruption. Until the last 20 years or so, most laws and regulations were relatively weak, other than the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).
Bribery and corruption can cause extreme harm to organisations and economies, causing distrust, financial loss, criminal consequences and loss of reputation. A growing intolerance for corruption and increased outrage at high-profile cases has changed the landscape considerably, resulting in the more recent UK Bribery Act (UKBA) 2010 and other similar stringent laws.
The following are some of the notable anti-bribery anti-corruption laws and regulations around the world.
U.K. Bribery Act of 2010
Under the U.K. Bribery Act, an “adequate procedures” defence would be considered during an investigation into a corporate failure to prevent bribery. The act provides commercial organisations with a defence to liability when they can prove and demonstrate that they had proper procedures to prevent persons associated with the organisations from undertaking bribery-related conduct.
Consequently, corporations that are otherwise liable can escape criminal liability from the regulation if they can prove that they had in place “adequate procedures” to avoid the relevant illegal conduct from occurring. This defence is unique because it contends that corporations act in good faith and take proper precautions throughout the organisation to implement adequate compliance procedures and avoid being held criminally accountable for preventing bribery. This defence is significant because there is no such defence under the FCPA (see below) or most other foreign anti-bribery laws.
The 2010 U.K. Ministry of Justice Guidance on the U.K. Bribery Act provides that “commercial organisations [should] consider how to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of their bribery prevention procedures and adapt them where necessary.
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), USA
While corporate compliance procedures are not considered in the liability phase of the FCPA, they are considered during the sentencing phase by the U.S. Department Of Justice (DOJ) relevant to the FCPA. The United States Sentencing Commission outlines through its Federal Sentencing Guideline Manual six factors — four aggravating and two mitigating — that a sentencing court must consider in determining the appropriate penalty on organisations convicted under the FCPA.
The existence of an effective compliance program is one of the two mitigating factors. Subsequently, an organisation convicted of FCPA violations can use the existence of an effective compliance program to reduce a penalty against it potentially. However, US DOJ’s recently published “Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Program Guidelines” referenced J.M. 9-28.300. These factors include “the adequacy and effectiveness of the corporation’s compliance program at the time of the offence, as well as at the time of a charging decision” and the corporation’s remedial efforts “to implement an adequate and effective corporate compliance program or to improve an existing one.”
Section §8B2.1 (b)(5)(A) of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines provides that an “organisation shall take reasonable steps … to ensure that the organisation’s compliance and ethics program is followed, including monitoring and auditing to detect criminal conduct.”
European Union Anti-Corruption Conventions
Several anti-corruption conventions have entered into force for European Union (EU) member nations. These include the Council of Europe Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (COE Criminal Law Convention), the Council of Europe Civil Law Convention on Corruption (COE Civil Law Convention), the European Union Convention against Corruption Involving Officials (EU Convention against Corruption), and the European Union Convention on the Protection of the European Communities’ Financial Interests (EU Convention on Financial Interests).
The United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC)
The United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) is the only legally binding international anti-corruption multilateral treaty. Negotiated by member states of the United Nations (UN) it has been adopted by the UN General Assembly in October 2003 and entered into force in December 2005.
The United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) entered into force in 2005. According to the United Nations: UNCAC is “the only legally binding universal anti-corruption instrument. The Convention’s far-reaching approach and the mandatory character of many of its provisions make it a unique tool for developing a comprehensive response to a global problem.
“The Convention covers five main areas: preventive measures, criminalisation and law enforcement, international cooperation, asset recovery, and technical assistance and information exchange.”
“The Convention covers many different forms of corruption, such as bribery, trading in influence, abuse of functions, and various acts of corruption in the private sector. A highlight of the Convention is the inclusion of a specific chapter on asset recovery, aimed at returning assets to their rightful owners, including countries from which they had been taken illicitly. The vast majority of United Nations Member States are parties to the Convention.”
Malaysia’s MACC Corporate Liability Provisions
Malaysia took a strong stance against corruption with the Corporate Liability Provisions of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (Amendment) Act 2018 (MACC). Section 17A of the MACC Act 2018 enables the prosecution of individuals and organisations accused of corruption.
According to an article in the New Straits Times, under the provisions, an organisation’s “directors, controllers, officers, partners, or managers are deemed to have committed the same offence, which carries a maximum penalty of a fine of not less than 10 times the value of the gratification or RM1 million, whichever is higher, and 20 years’ jail unless the firm is able to prove that it had in place procedures designed to prevent corrupt practices. The provision is modelled after the United Kingdom’s Section 7 of the Bribery Act 2010, which is widely regarded as ‘the toughest anti-corruption legislation in the world.’”
Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA), Singapore
The Prevention of Corruption Act 1960 (PCA) is the primary anti-corruption law in Singapore. Enacted in 1960, the PCA empowers the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), and governs and defines corruption and its punishments.
CPIB also strongly encourages companies to obtain certification under the Singapore Standard (S.S.) ISO 37001 – Anti-Bribery Management Systems to help companies implement or enhance an anti-bribery management system to reduce corporate risk and reputational costs.
France’s Sapin II Law
Sapin II entered into force in France in 2017. The anti-corruption law addresses transparency, anti-corruption and economic modernisation. Sapin II legislated new provisions, such as the requirement that organisations must implement an anti-corruption program to identify and reduce corruption risks.
Under Sapin II, it is illegal to give gratuities such as gifts, donations or rewards if the intent is to gain influence, usually with a public official, to gain an unfair business advantage. Notably, it extends extra-territorial reach for French prosecutors, applying to corruption by French companies overseas and foreign companies with a footprint in France.
According to the Forbes article “Will The Sapin II Anti-Corruption Law Shepherd France Into A New Era Of Transparency?”, “The law is intended as a civil, preventive instrument and has a positive obligation on companies at its core. It does not significantly interfere with existing laws and sentencing guidelines on corruption and ‘traffic d’influence,’ and it doesn’t require a predicate offense to kick in. In short, it looks and feels different from its UK and American counterparts in subtle but important ways.”
German Anti-Corruption Laws
Germany addresses bribery and corruption offenses in its Law on Fighting Corruption, its Criminal Code, and its Administrative Offences Act. The Criminal Code applies to individuals (persons), and the Administrative Offences Act enforces responsibility against companies. Similar to UKBA and Sapin II (France), companies or individuals that commit offences abroad can be prosecuted under German law.
Under Germany’s Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch) it is prohibited for a person to offer or accept a bribe – including so-called facilitation payments. Punishments can be severe, including up to 10 years in prison plus fines. Company executives can themselves be held liable if they encouraged the action, or even just knew about it and failed to stop it. The Administrative Offences Act, on the other hand, enforces civil penalties for companies. Companies can be fined up to EUR 10 million for each intentional criminal offense. Negligent criminal offenses are punishable too, with penalties of up to EUR 5 million for each negligent criminal offense. Penalties can be increased to include ill-gotten gains from bribery and corruption.
The Russian Federal Anti-Corruption Law
Under Russia’s Federal Anti-Corruption Law No. 273, Article 13.3, companies operating in the country must put into place anti-corruption programs, with specific, prescribed measures to prevent corruption as detailed in the law. Companies must also adopt procedures for cooperation with law enforcement, adopt an ethical code of conduct for employees, establish policies against conflicts-of-interest, and take other measures. In recent years, Russia has increased enforcement against bribery offences, and has strengthened legislation to be more in line with other European anti-corruption laws as well as the FCPA (USA).
Anti-Corruption Laws in China
China announced a war on corruption in recent years, and launched investigations and enforcement actions pursuant to that campaign. Most anti-corruption provisions are found in China’s Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Criminal Law of the PRC.
Under the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the PRC commercial bribery is prohibited and punishable by fines and sanctions, which can elevate to criminal investigations. Under the Criminal Law of the PRC, it is prohibited to give money or property to obtain an undue benefit. Penalties can be very severe, including the death penalty, for extreme cases. Government and business leaders in past, high-profile cases have suffered this fate. More common punishments include fines and imprisonment.
Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (CFPOA)
The Canadian Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (CFPOA) came into force in 1999, fulfilling its obligations under the UN Convention against Corruption. The CFPOA covers “Every person commits an offence who, in order to obtain or retain an advantage in the course of business, directly or indirectly gives, offers or agrees to give or offer a loan, reward, advantage or benefit of any kind to a foreign public official or to any person for the benefit of a foreign public official as consideration for an act or omission by the official in connection with the performance of the official’s duties or functions” or “to induce the official to use his or her position to influence any acts or decisions of the foreign state or public international organisation for which the official performs duties or functions.”
The African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption
The African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption came into force in 2006. The convention criminalises bribery, both in domestic and foreign cases, along with “trading in influence,” money laundering and offences. It was conceived to address bribery and corruption across the whole of the African continent, creating a consensus on preventing and punishing illicit acts described in the convention. By adopting the convention, the signatories are required to open investigations and prosecute corruption to further international cooperation and promote asset recovery.
Brazil’s Anti-Corruption Act
The Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law prohibits companies (acting through directors, officers, employees or through external companies or individuals) from offering or giving an unjust advantage to a domestic or foreign public official or to a related third party, or from financing or subsidising such conduct, according to acc.com
It also forbids certain practices that jeopardise the competitive character of public bids or that affect the issuance of public contracts. The prohibited conduct is very broad and includes not only the actual payment or provision of any undue advantage to any public official or third party, but also the acts of offering, promising, sponsoring or otherwise supporting such activity.
The Anticorruption Law is not limited to corruption involving foreign officials. Like the FCPA, USA and unlike the UK Bribery Act, the Anticorruption Law does not reach corrupt acts committed within the private sphere (commercial bribery). The Anticorruption Law imposes civil and administrative liability on corporations engaging in wrongful acts in relation to any public official, whether domestic or foreign.
How ISO Certification can help
No matter where your organisation conducts business around the world, you are likely under the jurisdiction of one or more of the above pieces of legislation, or others. The possibility of fines, imprisonment, or worse (such as in China) should motivate every business leader to enact compliance measures and stay within the letter of the law when it comes to bribery and compliance. This is easily done with ABAC’s ISO Certification.
ISO 37001 Anti-bribery Management Systems standard outlines the fundamental elements needed to establish anti-bribery anti-corruption compliance. Engage ABAC® Certification’s expert for ISO 37001:2016 training and ISO Certification in order to prevent and detect bribery and corruption and remain in compliance.
ABAC accredited by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS)
ABAC® is accredited by United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) for administering ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management System certification. Pursuant to this, UKAS accredited ABAC® in the UK, Malaysia and Dubai for ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management Systems (ABMS) certification in accordance with ISO/IEC 17021-1: 2015 conformity assessment requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems. UKAS is the sole national accreditation body for the United Kingdom and is recognised by the government, to assess against internationally agreed standards, organisations that provide ISO Certification, testing, inspection and calibration services.
Accreditation by UKAS demonstrates the competence, impartiality and performance capability of ABAC Certification services. UKAS is a non-profit-distributing private company, limited by guarantee, and is independent of Government.
Zafar Anjum, CEO of CRI Group and ABAC®, said “We are honoured that UKAS has accredited the ABAC® for the scope of ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management System. We know this anti-bribery management standard is critical for any organisation seeking to prevent bribery, demonstrate ‘adequate procedures’, and stay in compliance with new and emerging laws and legislation.”
“As the United Kingdom’s sole national accreditation body, UKAS’s endorsement is critical in knowing ABAC® Certification Auditors’ and subject-specific experts’ competencies and our certification process for ISO 37001:2016 ABMS are at the highest level,” said Huma Khalid, Scheme Manager at ABAC®
ABAC:A proud member of Association of British Certification Bodies (ABCB)
ABAC® is a proud member of Association of British Certification Bodies (ABCB), the recognised voice of accredited certification bodies in the UK. ABCB represents the views of its members to UKAS, IAF, EA and government to name a few. ABCB empowers accredited certification bodies by putting members first and representing their interests in the UK, Europe and globally on all matters relating to conformity assessment.
What this means for ABAC® is having a voice in the industry and government – to provide input and expertise on matters of policy and upcoming regulations, compliance standards, and laws. “Our membership with ABCB provides a seat at the table, which is critically important as standards and regulations undergo continual changes,” Zafar Anjum said. “It also provides us with advanced notification of potential revisions to those standards and regulations. This can be a critical advantage to our clients, and to us as we tailor our certification programs to meet these updates.”
Why is UKBA highly relevant to the pharmaceutical industry?
ABAC® Center of Excellence: Aiming for a higher standard
At ABAC® Center of Excellence Limited, we are affiliated with leading certification and accreditation bodies around the world. These affiliations and accreditations help demonstrate the high level of experience, knowledge and credibility we provide in anti-bribery, risk and compliance management to our clients on a daily basis. That’s why ABAC® has achieved essential accreditations from the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS), Emirates International Accreditation Center (EIAC) and membership in the Association of British Certification Bodies (ABCB). ABAC® is also a member of the “Partner in Corporate Governance” programme with the Malaysian Institute of Corporate Governance (MICG) and a Corporate Member of Transparency International Malaysia (TI-M).
ABAC® was established in 2016 by CRI Group, a global leader in risk, compliance and anti-bribery management systems. ABAC® was launched to provide certification and online training in anti-bribery and anti-corruption risk management and compliance for organisations worldwide.
ABAC® CEO Zafar I. Anjum, CFE, said that the company is proud to be accredited by, and affiliated with, international accreditation and ISO Certification bodies: “Our engagement with high-profile bodies like EIAC, ABCB and UKAS demonstrates the effectiveness of our ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management System certification and training, along with our ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management- Guidelines; ISO 37000:2021 Governance of Organisations; ISO 37002:2021 Whistleblowing Management System; and ISO 37301:2021 (formerly ISO 19600) Compliance Management system (CMS) programs.”
Visit the ISO 37001 Certification page and learn more about how your organisation can benefit from ABAC’s ISO Certification today.
